Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
Comment: Migrated to Confluence 4.0

...

  • Scan Amplitude = 2V (or 4V if a differential input is employed). This corresponds approximately to field-of-view scanned using Scan Amplitude = 2.5V  (or 5V with differential input) under ScanImage 3.0/3.5.
  • For this particular galvo, measured Acquisition Delay = 100?s (Scan Delay = 200?s). These values were entered and held fixed -- i.e. the linear optimization regime was employed. This Scan Delay value is well above small-angle step response specification; a better tuned scanner/servo would likely perform better.

At the specified fill fractions, the temperature remained below 50°C during 1 hour of continuous scanning. The temperature had remained stable for at least 5-10 minutes at that point.

Values are color-coded as follows:

Red: Maximum safe value found (if any) is below the optimal fill fraction value determined for the linear regime . That value is provided (given in parentheses). In this caseother words, thermal considerations are the limiting factor at this speed/amplitude.

Orange: Value represents the optimal fill fraction value determined for the linear regime. At that value, stable temperature was reached in the range of 40-50°C at 1 hr. Higher fill fractions, which would be in the nonlinear regime, were not tested and appear to be at risk of overheating.

Green:  Value represents the optimal fill fraction value determined for the linear regime (or 0.819, whichever is lower). At that value, stable temperature was reached below 40°C at 1 hr. Higher fill fractions were not tested, but appear to be possible.

(warning)   These results, of course, are provided as a reference only. They are in no way a guarantee.
(info)   Possibility of using fill fraction values above the optimum for the linear regime only applies for sawtooth scanning.

Sawtooth Scanning


16° 1x

2x 3x

5.33°

4x 5x

3.2°

1 ms/line

NONE (0.569554)

NONE (.661621) 

0.569 585  (.683640)

 

0.621 (.640)

0.640  

2 ms/line

0.706

0.759

0.787

0.819

0.819

Bidirectional Scanning

 

16°

1x 2x

5.33°

3x 4x

3.2°

0.5 ms/line

 

 

 

NONE (0.640)

NONE (0.640)

0.706

0.706

0.706  

1 ms/line

0.819

0.759

 

 

819

0.819  

0.819 

0.819 

2 ms/line

0.819 

 

 


0.819

0.819

0.819

0.819  

NOTE: Values above 0.819 were not tested.

...

  • Temperature measured using Fluke 179 multimeter using Fluke 80BK-A temperature probe (Type-K thermocouple)
  • Galvo was mounted on a standard aluminum mounting block (available from Cambridge Technology) which in turn was placed on a stainless steel shelf in a well-ventilated room/area
  • Probe was fixed to exposed side of galvo can, towards the mirror, using thermal compound
  • Baseline temperature for tests was ?24.5°C
  • Optimal fill fraction fulfilling 'linear' condition was determined by eye - i.e. it was judged that ripple had sufficiently settled by the desired ramp start position